相关试卷

"In general, we found park visitors reported an improvement in emotional well-being after the park visit,"   the study's lead author, Professor Hon K. Yuen at the University of Alabama at Birmingham said in a statement. " Instead, we found time spent in the park is related to improved emotional well-being. "

For the study, 94 adults visited three city parks in Mountain Brook, Alabama. They also completed a questionnaire about their subjective well-being before and after their visit. A visit of between 20 and 25 minutes showed the best results, with a roughly 64% increase in the participants' self-reported well-being, even if they didn't move a great deal in the park.

The study group was truly small, as the study's co-author and another UAB professor, Gavin Jenkins, acknowledged. The challenge facing cities is that there is increasing evidence about the value of city parks but we continue to see the decrease of these spaces.

A. But we didn't find levels of physical activity are linked to improved emotional well-being.

B. The length of their physical activity was tracked.

C. The best part of it is that you needn't visit a national park or go far out of your way.

D. However, its findings pointed out the importance of city parks.

E. If you want to feel happier, you just need to exercise for 20 minutes in a park.

F. This means people can benefit from visiting a nearby park, regardless of physical ability.

G. You usually visit a small green space in your neighborhood.

That's the idea behind the Emotion Evoking System developed by Shigeo Yoshida and colleagues at the University of Tokyo in Japan. The system can manipulate your emotions and personal preferences by presenting you with an image of your own smiling or frowning face. The principle that physiological changes can drive emotional ones — that laughter comes before happiness, rather than the other way around — is a well-established idea.

The researchers wanted to see if this idea could be used to build a computer system that manipulates how you feel. The system works by presenting the user with a webcam (网络摄像头) image of his or her face — as if they were looking in a mirror. The image is then subtly altered with software, turning the corners of the mouth up or down and changing the area around the eyes, so that the person appears to smile or frown.

Without telling them the aim of the study, the team recruited 21 volunteers and asked them to sit in front of the screen while performing an unrelated task. When the task was complete the participants rated how they felt. When the faces on screen appeared to smile, people reported that they felt happier. Conversely, when the image was given a sad expression, they reported feeling less happy.

Yoshida and his colleagues tested whether manipulating the volunteers' emotional state would influence their preferences. Each person was given a scarf to wear and again presented with the altered webcam image. The volunteers that saw themselves smiling while wearing the scarf were more likely to report that they liked it, and those that saw themselves not smiling were less likely.

The system could be used to manipulate consumers' impressions of products, say the researchers. For example, mirrors in clothing-store fitting rooms could be replaced with screens showing altered reflections. They also suggest people may be more likely to find clothes attractive if they see themselves looking happy while trying them on.

"It's certainly an interesting area," says Chris Creed at the University of Birmingham, UK. But he notes that using such technology in a shop would be harder than in the lab, because people will use a wide range of expressions. "Attempting to make slight differences to these and ensuring that the reflected image looks believable would be much more challenging," he says.

Of course, there are also important ethical questions surrounding such subtly manipulative technology. "You could argue that if it makes people happy, what harm is it doing?" says Creed. "But I can imagine that many people may feel manipulated, uncomfortable and cheated if they found out."

There were about 6 cages underwater surrounding the dock where the3 were and where you could swim with them. These cages had no4 part. They rose out of the5 about a foot and had a fairly good amount of depth. These dolphins could easily jump over the cages.

As the tour started,6, our Cuban guide overheard everyone talking about the cages. Therefore, he started off the tour by7 the intelligence of dolphins and the deal8 people made with them. Not sure how they started the9, but basically it follows as this. These dolphins are completely10. They arrive inland during a certain part of the season when they find it difficult to find11 in the seas. They will12 and live in the dolphin park and get fed with really good food. When hurricane season starts, they go back to the13 and stay there until the season changes.

The dolphins are there by their own free will because it14 them. I wished other facilities could establish a   15like this.

To study "jumping", we examined decision-making patterns among more than 600 people from the general population. We found that jumpers made more errors than non-jumpers on problems that require thoughtful analysis. In a quiz about US citizens, they overestimated the chance that their answers were right significantly more than other participants did — even when their answers were wrong.

So what is behind "jumping"? Psychological researchers commonly distinguish between two pathways of thought: automatic system, which reflects ideas that come to the mind easily and without effort, and controlled system including conscious and effortful reasoning. Jumpers and non-jumpers are equally influenced by automatic thoughts.

It is the controlled system that helps people counter balance mental biases introduced by the automatic system. As a result, jumpers were more likely to accept the conclusion made at first sight without further questioning. A lack of controlled thinking is also more broadly connected to their problematic beliefs and faulty reasoning.

A method called cognitive training can be used to target their biases, which can help people think more deliberatively. In this training, participants are faced with their own biases. They can learn about the missteps and other ways of thinking through the problem at hand. It helps to gradually get rid of participants' overconfidence.

In everyday life, the question of whether we should think things through or instead jump to a conclusion is a frequent and important one. Sometimes the most important decision we make can be to take some more time before making a choice.

A. Happily, there may be some hope for jumpers.

B. Also, jumpers had problems with overconfidence.

C. We plan to trace other problems introduced by jumping.

D. But a fair number of individuals are quick to jump to conclusions.

E. It is certainly possible for them to overthink things to take a decision.

F. The jumpers, however, did not engage in controlled reasoning to the same degree as non-jumpers.

G. Recent studies show that even gathering just a little bit more evidence may help us avoid a major mistake.

It wasn't until my reflection in the mirror no longer matched the lively, intelligent person I felt inside that I realized the severity of my situation. Clothes that once fit me perfectly are now uncomfortably light, and climbing a flght of stairs leaves me breathless. Not to mention that, in the past two to three years, my weight gain has influenced my self-esteem, confidence, and overall well-being.

In my search for a healthier lifestyle, I decided to turn to zero-calorie drinks, believing they would be a healthier alternative to my beloved sugary drinks. However, my research led me to an alarming discovery of the dangers of aspartame, a commonly used artificial sweetener found in many zero-calorie drinks. Despite its lack of calories, aspartame has been linked to many health concerns including headaches, dizziness, and even more severe conditions. More studies are needed to learn about artificial sweeteners' long-term effects on our health. Still, knowing this put me off zero-calorie drinks for a while!

With newfound knowledge and determination, I began my journey, to break free from sugar addiction. The journey was challenging, with persistent cravings and constant temptations (诱惑). However, armed with healthier snack alternatives, such as fruit and nuts, and the support of loved ones, I gradually weaned myself off the sugar roller coaster. I am rediscovering some of the joys of a more balanced lifestyle. Regular exercise became my companion, boosting my energy levels and reducing stress.

About this opportunity

If you are looking for a volunteer position at this time and are located in Queensland, this role could be perfect for you!

Arthritis Queensland is looking for some warm and engaging Fundraising Support Volunteers. These volunteers will call our donors and supporters to let them know how much we appreciate their help! There is no asking for donations in this role.

This is an online role and will be done from your own home. The shifts are flexible and will be on an agreed schedule. Full training will be provided before you begin. All that you will need for this role is a reliable telephone and a computer with a reliable Internet connection.

Please read the Arthritis Queensland position description and fill in our application form (the link will be sent to you after you express your interest). From there we'll review your application and you may be invited for a phone interview to discuss the role. We look forward to hearing from you!

Additional requirements

●Excellent communication skills

●Comfortable with using Microsoft IT packages

●Willing to obtain a Police Check (organised through Arthritis Queensland)

●Strong customer service skills and a friendly phone manner

Time Required

●Up to 15 hours over two days per week

Suitable for

●Online & Remote Volunteers

●People with disability